Add a Comment
by actornaught October 14, 2010 12:31 PM EDT
School kids are THE experts in rating maturity, fur shurr...
Reply to this comment
by filmguy107 October 14, 2010 1:39 PM EDT
..TOTALLY!
by fairfaxjoelives October 14, 2010 12:29 PM EDT
She was out numbered 3 to 1 with Wolf and the other lady and C O O N S all against her. Yes she won. How many of you can tell me right away the last thing the SCOTUS just ruled on?
Reply to this comment
by snaxmaster October 14, 2010 1:01 PM EDT
They didn't ask what the last thing the SCOTUS ruled on, they asked her to name any of the most recent things they have ruled on. She couldn't name a single one. Don't you think that is something a U.S. Senator should know?
by jasonmcj October 14, 2010 1:13 PM EDT
She won? On what grounds do you base this ridiculous claim. Note: Just becuase you like her or hate *****, does NOt mean she won. In fact, she did terrible. Another waffling hypocrite.
by jasonmcj October 14, 2010 1:16 PM EDT
On top of that, why should random internet posters be knowledgable of SCOTUS decisions?...it is not OUR JOB to know these things. I know MY job very well thank you. As a Sentor, she should have knowledge of these things....
by October 14, 2010 12:19 PM EDT
O'Donnell is really struggling to gain a veneer of being mainstream but the countless video clips of her making really bizarre statements in the not so distant past pretty much precludes having her represent us by sitting in a United States Senator's chair. I mean, even Karl Rove (Karl Rove!) deemed her "nutty". Plus she is mean and vicious and not afraid to lie and spin to attack her opponent and I think that came out in the debate with her bearded marxist attack when anyone who read the article could tell it was a joke. Her shadowy innuendoed primary campaign ("I never said that Mike Castle was gay. I don?t endorse putting out rumors that Mike Castle is gay." then saying "You know, I released a statement today, saying Mike this is not a bake-off, get your man-pants on.") Just mean and vicious. This is someone who is supposedly profoundly Christian? Much more witch-like in her actions if you ask me.
Reply to this comment
by lebeok October 14, 2010 12:16 PM EDT
Apparently the students at Deleware are not all that bright if they thought this was draw. O'Donnell was almost as unprepared as Palin was for her debates.
Reply to this comment
by filmguy107 October 14, 2010 12:33 PM EDT
welcome to the new century.....(be VERY afraid...they can vote!!)
by snaxmaster October 14, 2010 1:03 PM EDT
They didn't say she wasn't unprepared, they basically said Mike ***** wasn't any more mature than she was. I'd agree. Why the attacks were needed, I do not know. I'm pretty sure it didn't settle well with many independents.
by jasonmcj October 14, 2010 1:31 PM EDT
@snax...how is questioning commnets she herself made, word for word, considered "attacks"? Almost every tea-bagger with this complete ignornace...it is annoying and damning to America
by dadirt October 14, 2010 12:16 PM EDT
Interesting the guy is a harvard grad and another Ivy league college, and the lady is just a dummy as far as the dems and the media portray her, and it was a tie? And a tie as viewed by college kids? the ultimate liberals? How can that be?
Reply to this comment
by propitiation October 14, 2010 12:25 PM EDT
Even the college students are getting the fact that the ideas of the Democrats and President Obama are too extreme to the Left. More unemployment, forcing all students to pay for their Health Care, less good paying jobs...It's like a monster movie.
by snaxmaster October 14, 2010 1:06 PM EDT
"by propitiation October 14, 2010 12:25 PM EDT Even the college students are getting the fact that the ideas of the Democrats and President Obama are too extreme to the Left. More unemployment, forcing all students to pay for their Health Care, less good paying jobs...It's like a monster movie." Since when is raising the age limit for coverage of students under their parents' healthcare from 21 to 26 "forcing all students to pay for their Health Care?"
by mmac47 October 14, 2010 12:13 PM EDT
More than once, he claimed that he could not understand what she was talking about, accusing her at one point of "a fascinating question that really made no sense." It sounds like ***** needs to go back to school and learn the basics of learning.
Reply to this comment
by bcc243 October 14, 2010 12:08 PM EDT
If you watched, she won all the issues that actually matter. While the moderator wolf blitzer kept trying to ask about silly things that would never come up in the senate, like if she believes in creationism or evolution? Like that really matters to how our senate operates. She clearly won.
Reply to this comment
by filmguy107 October 14, 2010 12:34 PM EDT
....really???
by jamesonedin October 14, 2010 12:44 PM EDT
belief in creationism wouldn't matter? I take it mental disease is not an issue to you then.
by snaxmaster October 14, 2010 12:59 PM EDT
SERIOUSLY? Belief in Evolution or Creationism doesn't matter when it comes to how Senate operates? SERIOUSLY? So with that mindset, it would be OK if a person who believed the Earth flat or that thunder and lightning is actually God bowling with the angels was elected to the Senate? And that her religious and scientific views wouldn't influence her judgement on things that concern our country in any way whatsoever? Hell, let's just vote Merlin into office then.

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com. Follow us on Facebook.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
Flash Points: Yemen, Pakistan, France & Indonesia

Our daily Web show, Washington Unplugged, gives an insider's view of politics & those that make it happen.

More Washington Unplugged
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER
CBS News on Facebook